tested WiFi Direct against Quick Share and it's faster but I can't use it?!
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    3mo ago 100%

    Just tried it, pretty slow (6.4 MB/s) maybe due to encryption (as mentioned in the github repo) but anyway it doesn't utilize WiFi direct, works almost the same as every other app out there (both devices must be connected to the same network)

    Just checked the github repo and I'm honestly disappointed seems like the devs ain't interested in supporting WiFi Direct, they can't see what sets it apart, well you know what they say if you want something then do it yourself

    5
  • So yesterday I tested WiFi Direct against Quick Share and to my surprise (kinda) WiFi Direct was much faster than the latter Tried sending a 1.21GB video file from a Galaxy S6 to a galaxy note 9 * **WiFi Direct: 54.71 MB/s** * **Quick Share: ~33 MB/s** OneUI can show network speed in real-time in the notification panel, that's how I captured these numbers and they were very stable and I did it multiple times just to confirm. Unfortunately samsung and all other OEMs have basically killed WiFi Direct, I can only receive files, they removed the option to send files through WiFi Direct on newer versions of android (I think A11 and later) a long time ago that's why I can't do this test in reverse (from N9 to S6) I tried looking up for an app on Google play store, galaxy store, F-Droid that can send files using WiFi Direct but found nothing, that's really puzzling for me, like why?! This standard is very old by now, it's been on our phones for more than a decade and yet no way to fully utilize it?! For the ones who don't know WiFi Direct is a P2P connection.

    15
    4

    cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/9853743 > I'm running OpenSUSE leap 15.5, When I was on the linux mint, I was using warpinator but using it on openSUSE is troublesome and I wish there was a linux version of blip but unfortunately there is not.

    33
    27

    I'm running OpenSUSE leap 15.5, When I was on the linux mint, I was using warpinator but using it on openSUSE is troublesome and I wish there was a linux version of blip but unfortunately there is not.

    177
    144

    I have tried * RiMusic * ViMusic * InnerTune * SpMp * ViTune * Gyawun * SimpMusic And in the end I settled on RiMusic which I'm really tired of, so frustrating when an app keep crashing out of nowhere. Have you tried any FOSS YTM app that you can say with confident that it is stable and it just works? Why not just use the official YTM app you may ask? Well so I can easily save and transfer my music listening data # update ------ I gave spotube a try and well I was disappointed then I finally gave spotify a shot and it looks promising

    9
    4
    linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    text clarity on windows is so good, can I get the same on linux?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    I have decided to switch to OpenSUSE which uses KDE by default so let's see and if this old laptop can't handle it then will switch to Lbuntu as LXQt is its main and only variant available unlike mint

    1
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    text clarity on windows is so good, can I get the same on linux?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    TBH I'm just following https://distrochooser.de/ #1 recommendation, I want something that works best for me, not willing to spend any more time in testing new things that might be good, if it is good then I will let the community try them 1st, I will be the last to jump in

    1
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    text clarity on windows is so good, can I get the same on linux?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    Idk but I forgot to mention that now the laptop actually wakes up from sleep after I switched to the OS drivers, those proprietary drivers are really bad, god I shouldn't have switched to them at all.

    1
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    text clarity on windows is so good, can I get the same on linux?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    Thanks for the valuable information! I'm still not sure if I'm gonna get a laptop or build a desktop as an upgrade for the future but one thing is sure is that 1440p is the absolute minimum for me, no way in hell I'm getting anything lower than that

    2
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    is there a download manager for Linux that just works?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    I tried it and unfortunately the browser integration is not good enough for me and for dl vs dlp well I don't know what's the difference between the 2 and I'm yet to use any of them

    1
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    is there a download manager for Linux that just works?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    I love its UI, so damn good, so damn clean, so simple, I was really really hoping that it would be it, I wanted it to be it but it lacks proper browser integration, the experience is not seamless as it should

    The perfect download manager for me would be IDM ease of use and and flawless browser integration + JDownloader2 FOSS nature and its advanceded features + Motrix simple and clean UI

    1
  • linux
    Linux 6mo ago
    Jump
    is there a download manager for Linux that just works?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearIM
    Im28xwa
    5mo ago 100%

    IDM looks like Windows 98 era

    Yep I agree but at least it looks like a desktop app not a phone app on a big screen, anyway it's okay I will keep using FDM while keeping an eye on XDM hopefully the new version will live up to the expectations

    1
  • https://libreddit.oxymagnesium.com/r/linux4noobs/comments/o8s1v2/internet_download_manager_idm_alternative_for/

    ## Something as simple and as convenient to use as [internet download manager](https://www.internetdownloadmanager.com/) If you have ever used IDM before then you know what I mean, I'm yet to find an alternative that's on par with its ease of use and convenience ### Here are my requirements: * I don't have to copy-paste any links or right click on any links (just like IDM) * it works on all sites, well except for mega.nz (just like IDM) * it can scan the website and show me a download button on top of the media if it detects media like a YouTube video or an audio file playing, etc... (just like IDM) * It works perfectly with Firefox (just like IDM) * it doesn't have to keep running in the background, starting a direct download link should initiate it and show me a pop download dialog/window (just like IDM) ### I have tried: * **[Persepolis](https://persepolisdm.github.io/)**: it has failed me miserably, the download fails 99% of the time (like from GitHub) so I ended up disabling the browser extension because it was getting in my way. * **[Motrix](https://motrix.app/)**: I have tried it on Windows with Firefox, but it doesn't auto-detect the downloads and I have to copy and paste the download links and in some cases this is very difficult as many websites don't show the direct download link to the user. * **[Varia](https://github.com/giantpinkrobots/varia)**: tried it quickly yesterday, and it failed to auto capture the download link and Firefox built in download manager started instead. * **[FDM](https://www.freedownloadmanager.org/)**: I have tried to download it off the package manager (a flatpak from Linux mint software manager) but it failed to install for some reason and now the download option doesn't load at all! But I have used FDM on Windows before, and it is not as good as IDM. ### I just downloaded [KGet](https://apps.kde.org/kget/), and it doesn't seem to be what I'm looking for, but we will see. ### Some notes: - [youtube-dl](https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl): I never used it before but from what I know about it, I'm pretty sure it doesn't fit my criteria - I'm using [1DM+](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=idm.internet.download.manager.plus) on my android phone, and it is so damn good, it's almost perfect, it is the golden standard for download managers on android, this app is another example of "it just works". * I think I'm losing hope, and I'm going to see if IDM can run perfectly using WINE ------ # final update Tested JDownloader2 with the Download with JDownloader Firefox extension vs FDM and the winner is FDM because it just worked out of the box no configuration was needed beyond just installing the browser extension, and it did a better job at meeting my requirements except for the 3rd one, but thankfully I found [this great extension](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/video-downloadhelper/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=search) so it's alright * ah I almost forgot, yes I tested DownThemAll, and it didn't automatically capture downloads, so this was an instant no

    89
    63

    I get this error message whenever I try to `{"message":"{\"msg\":\"No space left on device (os error 28)\",\"files\":null}"}`

    10
    3

    I tried different font settings in the font settings and it didn't improve much (font hinting, anti aliasing, custom DPI settings, different font size) The font is the default one which is Ubuntu Regular with font size set to 10 Sub pixel order is set properly to RGB **Linux Mint xfce** Even when running windows in a virtual machine, the font rendering in it is miles ahead of what I got on my Linux setup!!!

    73
    62

    cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/1181564 > Did you try all of them? > > What made you stick with the one you are currently using? > > I became fully aware of Control D only yesterday as the name was vaguely familiar to me when I heard it and for Adguard DNS well I thought it was a normal-ish DNS service like 1 1 1 1, quad9, Google, etc... (not that user configurable). > > I tried looking for some reviews and discussions comparing the 3 but found almost nothing about Control D and Adguard DNS but I did stumble upon Control D CEO 2 blog posts comparing Adguard DNS and NextDNS to Control D. > > There seems to be not that much talk about these 2 unlike NextDNS which seems way more popular, if I'm correct then what made it way more popular and known?

    28
    29

    Did you try all of them? What made you stick with the one you are currently using? I became fully aware of Control D only yesterday as the name was vaguely familiar to me when I heard it and for Adguard DNS well I thought it was a normal-ish DNS service like 1 1 1 1, quad9, Google, etc... (not that user configurable). I tried looking for some reviews and discussions comparing the 3 but found almost nothing about Control D and Adguard DNS but I did stumble upon Control D CEO 2 blog posts comparing Adguard DNS and NextDNS to Control D. There seems to be not that much talk about these 2 unlike NextDNS which seems way more popular, if I'm correct then what made it way more popular and known?

    24
    11

    I literally haven't seen anyone even mention it anywhere on the internet as if it never existed, when it comes to Ad blockers I always see uBO recommended with absolutely no mention whatsoever of ABP why? What makes it better than ABP? What happened to it? or maybe I'm wrong and ABP is not as well known as I think it is. I have been using ABP for many years until someday don't remember when I switched to uBO because I read that it is "the best ad blocker". I maybe need a history lesson as everything on the matter seems so vague to me and the whole situation is super weird

    -55
    84