Does anyone here use GNU Jami?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2d ago 100%

    Just so you know you can get push notifications on Jami. Jami has been supporting unified push notification for a while now, but it's opt-in, some might not opt for it considering reducing privacy a bit, as some actually disable the proxy and some phone specific feature intending to prevent battery exhausting too fast.

    For unified push support you can take a look at jami's article about its unified push support. I use ntfy BTW.

    2
  • Youtube: Free Software Is Under Attack? (Will You Help Defend It?)
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2d ago 80%

    I believe so but the video presenter is right in two aspects, the first, this is not anything new, RMS was even left out from his position after the influential banning movement against him got stronger some time back, and them that got reverted. At their time there was an open letter demanding RMS removal and the entire FSF board as well after re-electing him, and also a reaction open letter supporting RMS. There are also posts like the debunking of those allegations. As you can see this is not new, and the recurrent nature of these allegations really make one to think about their true intentions.

    Something to keep in mind there are some recent and not so recent allegations from one public and influential blog, for example the FSF is dying, RMS on sex and his latest allegations regarding RMS "neurodivergence". Perhaps these examples plus several additional ones in the same blog make the blogger one possible suspect in the video.

    And the second aspect I believe the video presenter is right about, is that after reading RMS' several posts, the allegations against him, and the debunking of those allegations, plus all that movement attempting his banning, it's clear that one can not be as naive to pretend this is just a personal attack, there's more to it in all this. The reputation of the FSF gets really hurt. What gets in people's mind is that the FSF, GNU, the copyleft in full defense of the user freedoms on software is no longer relevant and even polluted. People forget that in the name of supposedly good causes, a lot of damage has been done through out history, and this hating/banning/canceling movements do more harm than whatever good intentions might show up in the surface, so be cautious about them in general.

    3
  • https://youtube.com/watch?v=NLHIIVppdMw

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21522958 > *(cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21522265)* > > A group of people including Drew DeVault are trying to cancel RMS again, basing their claims on ancient misinterpreted quotes. Stallman may be controversial, but these activists are just acid for the entire Free Software movement.

    0
    3
    Free Software Is Under Attack! (Will You Help Defend It?)
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    3d ago 58%

    This banning culture of hate is ridiculous, you can disagree with someone, or even just ideas, but procuring "canceling" and "banning" to everything we don't agree is crazy. This mono culture of hate really saddens me. But perhaps you're right on your appreciation.

    Some of these periodical rebirths of the debate about RMS, what are really looking for is discredit on the Free software, which is not the same as open source software. Drew is one of those, if I'm not mistaken because his blog is prolific, who believe free software has no hope, and the total triumph of open source, which in practice is correct, but ethically I'm not so sure. We should be aware of what's behind all these attacks, and I believe it's naive to think these attacks are just about RMS. Free software is ethical in the sense of the freedoms it seeks for the users, but that has no place on enterprises and corporations, open source has enjoyed a different fate because it's not as strict on respecting those freedoms, which under enterprises and corporations are believed to be too restrictive and against their interests. And here we are over and over attacking the organizations (yes, the FSF is attacked not only because RMS is part of it, it was founded by him as well) and people defending those principles, because in the end our minds tend to disqualify everything way too easily, made easy with this banning culture of hate. I've read about how useless it is the FSF, and also about how useless it is the copyleft, and these recurrent intend to discredit the one who started all that of course discredits what came from him, one way or another. I wish I'm wrong on this, and that there was no pun intended towards free software...

    The original post was most probably included into the wrong community for sure BTW, this is an open source community, so looking to empathize about free software stuff in here is not going to happen, even less for RMS.

    2
  • Does anyone here use GNU Jami?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    1w ago 100%

    Are you sure the phone it doesn't work on is older than android 7? According to its f-droid jami URL its latest version as well as two more also documented there, they all work on android 7 or later.

    I use LOS4uG, and I'm currently on android 14, so no need to build jami myself. Can you enable "unstable updates" on f-droid's "expert mode"? Perhaps then you get latest app, and that one works better. Otherwise you can report an issue to the android client, and perhaps you get guidance from them. You can also use their forum to ask questions. I have filed issues only so far.

    1
  • Does anyone here use GNU Jami?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    1w ago 100%

    dino is a gnu+linux software, built with gtk4. If you're using windows then the option is gajim, which in order to support omemo needs a plugin, though I can't tell much more than that about it since I can't even recall when was the last time I used windows.

    That said, conversations has one important setting if syncing devices, which is indicating that the client won't delete messages, the server will. Not sure why that is not the default, I guess statistically most xmpp users just make use of conversations and that's it. The other important setting is configuring security for omemo always. Dino doesn't need any setting for letting the server delete messages (it does when there's no pending device to be synced) and doesn't offer that option, and at the moment the user must be careful and set each conversation to be secured by omemo with no exceptions, but it's already merged on master, and waiting for a new release, the option for omemo always, as on conversations.

    That said, using xmpp doesn't imply not having jami installed and keep trying it. Who knows, maybe you like it and it works fine for your purpose, and you decide for it to be you main messenger application.

    2
  • Does anyone here use GNU Jami?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    1w ago 100%

    I do !

    works pretty well on both AOSP phones and gnu+linux desktops. Sad thing though is that I don't like using flatpak, and I prefer distro native built software, and on Artix/Arch, there are times where the version between the distro version is slightly outdated with regards to the mobile version, and that makes things not to work. This is mainly an issue ever since jami decided to stop supporting the gtk client on the desktop, to me the qt experience have been sad. Not sure if someone has forked the gtk client, that would be great.

    So I'm using xmpp as my main messenger, and keep trying jami when it works.

    I really like the p2p approach from jami, and also the way they care for those with no huge batteries phones, given they added support for unified push notifications, which can be of course avoided if required for extra privacy. Given my use case, I can't turn jami into my main messenger yet, but I keep trying, :) Meanwhile xmpp is there for me.

    4
  • Has anyone done any research on the search engine Mojeek?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    1w ago 60%

    Is it something you have to trust they comply with what they say?

    Nice that it has its own indexes, but according to this comparison its proprietary SW, running on UK servers without tor interface, and being backed or debated at least by UK politicians. We're not talking about a not for profit organization either, and they do have individualized answers as well, so they have the mechanisms to individualize results to queries, meaning they keep information about your queries. So in the end, it boils down to the user trusting its service it seems.

    Yes, meta search engines do not provide their own indexes, but searxNG is at least open source, you can select the search engines to use, included mojeek, and they serve as a front end preventing the underneath engine to track you (whether it's against their public policy or not) as if you were to use such engine directly.

    1
  • How save is XMPP really?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2w ago 100%

    Conversation let you configure that all conversations are omemo secure by default (omemo always). Dino's next release will include it as well (omemo always issue)

    1
  • My #1 recommandation for messenger, as the day of today
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2w ago 100%

    Actually xmpp is low on metadata compared to matrix which has to replicate a bunch of metadata everywhere. SimpleX look interesting, though by not being federated (considered by simpleX a privacy feature) whether you like their client or not. Just so you know privacyguides has explained why they don't advertise xmpp as privacy oriented, and the reason is not that it isn't, it's simply that given it's federated, they consider some clients are not as compliant or up to date, which is up to the user to select on XMPP, and also up to the user to file bugs against their preferred client or even contribute it with changes.

    4
  • Privacy weather app?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2w ago 100%

    Not a hurricane tracker, but I'd like understand a bit about open-meteo and breezy weather. I notice for my country there's no way to be more specific than the whole country, therefore location needs to be enable, or so I guess.

    Does open-meteo requires some information exchange such that it's easy to identify the user/device? Does breezy weather actually attempts to anonymize the user or fake it to make them non identifiable?

    Just wondering.

    Thanks !

    1
  • FDroid vs FDroid Basic
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    2w ago 100%

    I agree ! I just pointed out the actual differences. And if you use LOS4uG, you have several options, keep F-Droid as it is, keep it and remove the privileged extension, remove it in favor of the basic version, and on top of the last option see if the unattended updates can be opted out/in.

    1
  • FDroid vs FDroid Basic
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    3w ago 100%

    Regarding android version, I think @boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net already gave a good hint. Currently f-droid version 1.21.0 supports android 6.0+.

    According to f-droid basic URL:

    NOTE: The Basic version of F-Droid Client has a reduced feature set (e.g. no nearby share and no panic feature). It targets Android 13 and can do unattended updates without privileged extension or root.

    I don't see the target version varying between them, I found both to be 1.21.0 on Android (I have enabled unstable updates), and both indicate they support android 6.0+. So if you have LOS or plain android on a version 6.0 or beyond, f-droid should be able to install and work on them.

    I use F-Droid since it comes pre-installed and with privileged extension set by default on LOS for MicroG, so I don't find it particularly appealing to install F-Droid basic instead, but if that were not the case, I'd go with F-Droid basic, given I don't set F-Droid to serve nearby devices on any phone, and I haven't ever thought of using the panic feature. I'm using LOS4uG 21, meaning android 14. with no issues, so perhaps 1.21.0 already target android 14, and not just android 13.

    So I believe both, the basic and the not basic versions of F-Droid target the same version, and support the same versions, the difference is in basic with a couple of less features. But you can always take a look at the version, and there you can tap on the specific version to see what versions of android are supported.

    Greetings !

    3
  • Firefox Rolls Out Total Cookie Protection By Default | The Mozilla Blog
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    4w ago 100%

    Oh thanks !

    This is all there is as of now:

    pref("browser.contentblocking.category", "strict");
    // enable APS
    defaultPref("privacy.partition.always_partition_third_party_non_cookie_storage", true);
    defaultPref("privacy.partition.always_partition_third_party_non_cookie_storage.exempt_sessionstorage", false);
    

    Maybe that's everything required now a days given it became default. But there used to be more options...

    Many thanks !

    1
  • Mozilla hit with privacy complaint over Firefox user tracking
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearKI
    kixik
    4w ago 87%

    Arkenfox user.js, or derivative broswers like Librewolf on the desktop and Mull on android are there for a reason. Firefox default settings are not the safer, although it has all the knobs to make it a much better experience.

    6
  • blog.mozilla.org

    Is this total cookie protection something embedded, not requiring any user intervention? I know with librewolf we get the strict enhanced cookie protection mode, but I don't know if for this total protection there's something required, if not turned on by default... Greetings !

    113
    2

    Hello ! I'm wondering if there's some blogging mechanism which would allow some sort of unique digital signature (PGP perhaps) to prevent personification, but which allows non traceable and fully anonymous author. Not looking for blockchain like stuff (apart from the layer Monero adds, blockchains are totally transparent, traceable and non anonymous). Not looking for bigotry, attacking people or anything like that. The idea is to be able to share ideas, even corporate related, without being afraid of retaliations whether at work, corporations or governments. Expressing something at pubic might bring unexpected consequences, particularly if not aligned by the corporation one works on if that's the case, or might provoke AI, bots, or paid/unpaid people looking around, to include anyone in a particular list, without even warning the writer about it. So I was looking if such thing is possible, and if it exists. Social networks of course wouldn't be an option, they're not anonymous, and at contrary can be used to cross-reference and trace people. If such solution doesn't exist, I'm wondering if something based on gnuNet might get close, although gnuNet is not meant to make users anonymous. Or perhaps something based on i2p. Of course the digital signature should be used exclusively for the blog posting, and can't be associated to any real email, host, or whatever... Feedback on the blog posts should also be allowed to anonymous people with their own unique digital signatures. But this is harder, since depending on the technology, not sure if moderation would be allowed, or even if it would make sense, in which case, no blog feedback should be allowed, though no feedback is really a down side for blog posts. Maybe allowing just the original post to remove feedback. Some other down side, but that's unavoidable, is the lack of non on thread feedback, meaning giving feedback through email or any other medium, since if that was available would make the writer non anonymous... If such thing is not available, and eventually based on something like gnuNet or i2p, most probably clients would be needed to write blogs but another one that would offer some sort of RSS/atom functionality for the blog to be accessible from current RSS/atom readers.

    16
    9
    soatok.blog

    This blog post, and some of its comments are pretty interesting and concerning at the same time. Not really sure if in the end that means that nothing other than centralized controlled messaging can be as cryptography safe. Any comments?

    6
    12
    "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearLE
    Lemmy Support kixik 5mo ago 100%
    not syncing xmpp community from slrpnk.net?
    lemmy.ml

    Hello, !xmpp@lemmy.ml was locked by my mods, and continued on !xmpp@slrpnk.net which is entirely fine given federation, so I guessed I could follow it on the lemmy sort of synced space/community, !xmpp@slrpnk.net, where I can post to the slrpnk community without having an account there. But for some reason recent posts on [slrpnk real xmpp community](https://slrpnk.net/c/xmpp) are not showing on !xmpp@slrpnk.net, like if they're not syncing anymore. Any way to remediate it?

    14
    8

    Hi ! As I have account on lemmy.ml, I look into the lemmy community created on slrpnk.net through the federated [lemmy community](https://lemmy.ml/c/xmpp@slrpnk.net), but its contents don't match the ones on the original [slrpnk community](https://slrpnk.net/c/xmpp). There are some messages missing. Not sure if this is something someone would care, but I was planning to look at the contents through the lemmy instance, where I do have my account... Greetings !

    2
    5
    blog.mozilla.org

    I believe the settings to disable this on Librewolf are set by default...

    71
    24

    Hey ! On LOS 21, the app DeviceLockController is there, but it can't be stopped neither disable, at least from my side. There's another one I don't trust, Android System Intelligence, but I could stop it and disable it. Those two apps really are scary to be part of LOS. Is anyone aware of bugs on LOS about getting rid of them? How about DeviceLockController? A reasonable way to disable it without risking too much bricking the phone in the process? Thanks !

    6
    0
    https://archlinux.org/news/the-xz-package-has-been-backdoored

    `xz-5.6.1-2` from Artix system repo is already available. Artix corresponding news: [The xz package has been backdoored](https://artixlinux.org/news.php#The_xz_package_has_been_backdoored)

    8
    1

    I'm not self hosting, so I'm depending on what the server admin enables, and the policies they establish. That said, the server fully supports [xep-0313](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0313.html), which perhaps among other things control messages being kept on the server precisely for the purpose of sending them to all registered devices, thus allowing the sync. But perhaps there's a policy in place removing the messages from the server as soon as some device has gotten it, leaving only online devices with the ability to grab them. I don't know if that's possible... I experimented getting a device offline for a couple of minutes, and then exchanged messages with another account, and also to my same account. Then eventually I got the device offline, and none of the messages, not even the ones sent to myself, were ever synced on the device just coming online... This is really sad, since that's precisely one of the benefits of having servers over peer to peer solutions, it's easier to sync devices through the server. Might this be some sort of policy to keep disk usage on the server low? I might need to explore some other server if that's the case... Thanks ! Edit: Communicated with the admin, and they mentioned this was unexpected.

    10
    7

    Just wondering, as the reasons to move here are gone, can the community go back to lemmy.ml? There are quite some posts over lemmy.ml, so going back there would be useful I believe, and also moving the few posts here over there would be just great (perhaps not the comments)... Just an honest question, not to provoke flame wars or anything like it... Greetings !

    -6
    3

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/12692350 > Anyone aware of a conversations fork with support for unified push notifications? Or a similar xmpp android app with omemo (just the same as conversations' support) and unified push notifications support, available through the official f-droid repor or a f-droid repo if not available from the official ones? > > BTW, I noticed [!xmpp@lemmy.ml](https://lemmy.ml/c/xmpp) community was locked. Any particular reason for that? Also, Converstions requests to set unrestricted use of battery, to use battery under background without restrictions. So it seems unified push notifications would help, though this [github issue](https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/issues/4014#issuecomment-783151358) sort of indicates unified push notifications wouldn't help, so it just tells me there's no intention to include support for it on Conversations, but not that it wouldn't help save battery.

    28
    11

    Anyone aware of a conversations fork with support for unified push notifications? Or a similar xmpp android app with omemo (just the same as conversations' support) and unified push notifications support, available through the official f-droid repor or a f-droid repo if not available from the official ones? BTW, I noticed [!xmpp@lemmy.ml](https://lemmy.ml/c/xmpp) community was locked. Any particular reason for that? Also, Converstions requests to set unrestricted use of battery, to use battery under background without restrictions. So it seems unified push notifications would help, though this [github issue](https://github.com/iNPUTmice/Conversations/issues/4014#issuecomment-783151358) sort of indicates unified push notifications wouldn't help, so it just tells me there's no intention to include support for it on Conversations, but not that it wouldn't help save battery.

    11
    10

    https://disroot.org provides several decentralized federated services, as email and xmpp, besides other cloud services as well... But not sure if asking here is right or not, but don't know anywhere to ask either... Is it having a license issue, does anyone know about it? Any status updates? ``` Websites prove their identity via certificates. LibreWolf does not trust this site because it uses a certificate that is not valid for disroot.org. The certificate is only valid for p1lg502277.dc01.its.hpecorp.net. Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN ``` But also: ``` disroot.org has a security policy called HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), which means that LibreWolf can only connect to it securely. You can’t add an exception to visit this site. The issue is most likely with the website, and there is nothing you can do to resolve it. You can notify the website’s administrator about the problem. ``` I also tested with ungoogled chromium and pretty similar thing... Anyonea aware, and also about disroot saying on this? Edit (sort of understood already, no issue with disroot at all): The issue only shows up under the office VPN. It seems like disroot is not recognizing the office's cert... Edit: Solved. Yes it's the office replacing the original cert with its own, as someone suggested. Thanks to all.

    13
    10
    https://docs.rs/shuttle/latest/shuttle

    Anyone aware of a testing framework hopefully integrating well, and abstracting the [shuttle](https://docs.rs/shuttle/latest/shuttle) testing functionality? BTW I found [rtest](https://docs.rs/rstest/latest/rstest), but it doesn't in particular abstracts shuttle at all, it's a fixtures generic framework. Planning to use shuttle to do MT testing targeting C binded code, and looking for a way to abstract as much as possible the shuttle scheduler trait and such... Thanks !

    6
    0
    blog.system76.com

    cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/6777822 > *Notable changes*: > - Tracking improvements. For example, if you use the launcher to launch an application and then switch workspaces, it will still launch in the workspace you opened it from; > - Supported the ext-session-lock protocol, which authenticates the user and informs the compositor when the session should be unlocked > - XDG activation and DBus activation support > - work on HDR > - Ongoing work to package COSMIC on NixOS: [tracking issue](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/259641)

    1
    0