Smeeee heeee

The gay aunt is transition goals for me. Too bad I'm going to have to spend a lot of money to have a chance of growing back enough hair to make that hair style viable.

I'd like to do some haram things with that cute Muslim b... err, I mean... nice infographic. Very informative.

One of those unlabeled files better have an off-screen tab that says "Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa" on it...

It all comes tumbling down, tumbling down, tumbling down. 🎶

If this is true, you are hurt from your own actions of hurting another person.

And thus, by putting her face all over a piece of art than fans liked for not having a face, Cynthia's hurt arises from her own actions of hurting the fans of the original.

If this is true ...

Congratulations! You detected my sarcasm. But if you'd like me to engage seriously, I'll bite.

Cynthia is allowed to be upset. She made some art and people didn't like it. It hurts to put yourself into something - in her case literally - and have people not like it. But that's the risk you run when you make art for other people. People are allowed to engage with art how they want.

What she is not entitled to do is pretend that this is degrading, or in someway offensive. If people were going round scratching out her face from random images, she might have a point. But that isn't what is happening here. She engaged with the original piece of art by making her own version and putting her face in it. Others engaged with her art by making their own versions and taking some of her face right back out of it in order to make it closer to the original. That's no more or less wrong than what she did. They're both perfectly fine. If her feelings are hurt, that's unfortunate, but it is incidental. And she is entitled to express that her feelings are hurt, but she is not entitled to pretend that that is anything more than incidental.

I daresay Peter Jackson might be upset when people make fan-edits of The Hobbit trilogy by removing a lot of his artistic vision to edit it down to a single watchable film. But if he came out and said it was personally degrading to him, people would call that ridiculous. If Evangeline Lilly said fans were "erasing women" by cutting out Tauriel, people would call that ridiculous. Everyone has their own visions when it comes to making adaptations of other works, and if people disagree with yours, it's not a personal attack, even if it feels like one.

That being said, I have no beef with Cynthia. She is no doubt getting a lot of grief from racist and sexist weirdos mixed in with the more legitimate negative feedback, so while I think that her statement above is ridiculous, I understand her feelings are hurt, and she is "lashing out" in what is ultimately a very small potatoes kind of way. I hope the movie does well.

As an aside; I'm a fan of musical theatre but an un-fan of the cost of musical theatre tickets, so I was very concerned that no one would attempt to adapt a Broadway/West End musical again after what Tom Hooper did to Cats. I saw Wicked in London and enjoyed it, so I'll probably watch this film if the reviews are at least halfway good.

Well I think it was offensive of Cynthia to erase the original artist's vision and it's shameful of you to defend her.

Both of you have hurt my feelings, and therefore you are in the wrong.

I don't think the argument does fail. OP is not arguing against killing in the heat of the moment in self-defence or whatever. OP is arguing specifically about executions after the fact. The only way "maximizing who survives" would be relevant is if you believe capital punishment is a deterrent, and that is arguable.

In my case there was only ever the one excuse, which is that I thought the pain of being a social outcast (I'm never gonna pass) would be worse than the pain of dysphoria. I knew trans people and thought: "Damn, they must have been in a lot of pain. Unlike me; I'm only in a bearable amount of pain. I hardly want to unalive myself at all except sometimes."

I don't think the contrarianism is Lemmy specific. Whenever someone becomes problematic for whatever, there'll always be people taking to twitter or whatever to say "well they were never really that good anyway". And it is almost always just a cope, except in the specific case of Rob Schneider.

Pretty! And I, too, am insanely jel of your hair!

Yeah, sorry. I'm not really a communist either, but I feel Marx has some useful things to say. Lenin... less so. I just feel the need to point that out so people might be less put off by Marx!

I think usually it's just for fun. "Fook" is supposed to be evocative of Northern England in the same way "feck" is of Ireland, but in my experience no one in Northern England pronounces it that way for real. Not in the North West, at least.

Just to add on to this that IIRC while Marx believed that the transition from socialism to communism would happen, the idea of a communist party guiding the people on the way is essentially the crux of Leninism.

Who is Badewanne and why does Des Archimedes want them to die?

From the people who brought us Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company ?

If you wanted to crack your egg, you ought simply to have walked between 1280 and 10240 steps, depending on your egg group.

But seriously, same. I knew I was trans as a teen but I stuck it out pretending to be cis until my 30s "for an easy life".

Quite frankly, if she doesn't know my boy "Restitutor Orbis" Aurelian, you should dump her.

I would have expected that he'd have to shell out for a huge fine.

Bell did prove mathematically that a local hidden variables theory is unable to explain observed quantum mechanics. This doesn't rule out nonlocal hidden variable theories, but a) that is called superdeterminism, and b) that would mean that there would be faster-than-light interactions, and that is in many ways weirder.