The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?

Preposterous notion.

The lions are nude, if that helps...

Are you replying to/commenting on the OP's title? Did you not read past its first sentence, into its second, mentioning the plane?

Fair rebuttal; we're meant to infer the left-side hand pointing at the watch belongs to the same model of the right-side arm that's wearing the watch. Admittedly, this is an assumption based on insufficient data. It's not impossible that the finger-pointing left hand and the watch-wearing right wrist are owned by two different models.

That doesn't change the fact that the watch is worn on a right-arm wrist in an orientation that would show it as upside down to a right-arm wrist owner.

The 3 McDonald's menu items' calorie values displayed add up to the sum displayed; where is there a discrepancy of 100?

How is McDonald's wrong? A few of the others are, but where is the error on that one?

Struggling to spell, read, or write can all be signs of dyslexia...

This answered nothing… Could you explicitly state what a mouth has to do with dyslexia?

The irony. :-|

Placement of the shark's eyes makes me question Larson's qualifications as a marine biologist.

I was thinking the same thing. This is a fine example of the exception to the rule that you should not place the horizon in the middle of the frame.

...our word “diamond” comes from adamant…

As does our word, "adamant". 🙂

I hope you have named these forks after Muppets.

From left to right, they are clear to me as: Robin the Frog, Kermit, Bunsen Honeydew, and Beaker.

There's nothing bad to see at that link, which is kind of the point. It's a BBC article that contains two photos of the suspect food in question, which is 10 years old (at the time of writing in 2019) and looking a bit, well, deflated instead of being completely decomposed.

If you're registered at those other instances, you can create another profile(s) in Jerboa that connects to them, and then using that profile, browse by Local, I suppose.

I'm registered at both lemmy.cafe and lemmy.ca, and have profiles for both registrations in Jerboa.

Otherwise, if you're registered only with Beehaw, I believe the answer is, "no, not in Jerboa, just with your device's normal web browser."

Garbage ad-laden filler puff-piece.

Thank you for confirming. Just before seeing your reply Notification I saw the "BE: 0.18.0" at the bottom of the webpage, and took that as a sign that you must've resolved whatever issues you'd had.
Jerboa is now accepting my login attempts, inasmuch as it isn't giving me the server incompatibility message anymore.

Thumbs-up, there. :)

Now Jerboa just thinks my username/email and password are invalid for lemmy.cafe login.
I'm just going to let the dust settle for a bit, keep trying in a few hours or tomorrow.

Thank you, again!

Does that mean the update is/did not complete yet?

Reason I ask is Jerboa got updated to 0.0.35 on my phone sometime mid-day today, and, when I launched it, was presented with the warning:

Server version (0.17.4) is under the minimum supported version (0.18).
Please inform your administrator and login to another instance, or sign out and use the default instance.

I logged out of my Jerboa profile on lemmy.cafe, which (unbeknownst to me) deleted the profile outright, which I presume & hope is a Jerboa bug.

I can re-add the profile again, no big deal, but it can't login to lemmy.cafe, for the same server version incompatibility error:

Server version (0.17.4) too low.

Gorgeous backlighting composition. It's quite striking, congrats!

Do you plan to clip the blacks for more contrast?

Thanks for the update of this update. :)

A reminder to all that the M stands for Master.

(Yes, I know it's used in the "mastery" sense, but just roll with the analogy!)

End your line with 2 spaces, then Enter.
This results in a line return instead of an ignored Return.